Sunday, March 24, 2013

Here Bully Bully Bully


In today’s society, it is almost impossible to not to hear about some sort of bullying case. Bullying has become a very widespread problem across the United States, and it has most definitely had its consequences on the fragile lives of numerous victims across the country. However, is the word “bullying” being too widely used? What exactly is considered bullying? Is a certain type of act considered bullying over another act?. The most recent laws involving anti-bullying includes at least two different definitions of what bullying is. This causes much confusion amongst parents, teachers, and society. If it is unclear what bullying actually is, we cannot move forward to try and ultimately end bullying for good. Emily Bazelon is a senior editor at Slate and the author of “Sticks and Stones: Defeating the Culture of Bullying and Rediscovering the Power of Character and Empathy.” Recently, she wrote an article entitled “Bully!” that was published in the New York Times. This article’s main focus addresses the fact that if we don’t have a clear understanding of what is considered bullying, we cannot try and move forward and address the problem and ultimately put an end to it.

            Bazelon touches on many very good points throughout her article. Her main focus touches on that of the definition of bullying and what is actually considered bullying. In many “bullying” cases today, observers have automatically assumed that certain instances and cases were a direct result of bullying. For example, in the Bailey O’Neill case, a 12 year old boy from Pennsylvania, his death was very widely attributed to bullying based on the allegations that his own class mate hit the boy in the face which ultimately led to a concussion and seizures which killed him. However, it is unsure if this “act” can be considered bullying, and not just a conflict between two boys. The district attorney in charge of this case has stated that he has no evidence that this tragedy was because of bullying. As adopted by psychologists, the definition of bullying is known as physical or verbal abuse that is repeated over a period of time. Bullying is a very particular form of harmful aggression that can be linked to very psychological and emotion damage, but in the short and long terms. Bullying also involves a power imbalance, which means that it’s all about one person having more social status and hovering it over the person being victimized. This is done over and over again ultimately making the victim miserable. Since there are very broad legal definitions of what exactly bullying is, this can lead parents, teachers, and children to cry bully whenever there is a conflict between two children. Life is full of conflicts and just because a child many encounter a conflict between another child, most definitely does not mean that this particular child is being bullied. Bazelon makes a very good point here. Due to the fact that we do not necessarily know the exact definition of bullying, it is very hard to pick through accusations and label a case as a bullying case. The “bully” label is very hard for a child to escape once they are labeled as a bully. If we consider every single conflict between two children an act of bullying, we are getting ourselves nowhere. This label can permanently damage a child’s reputation and make people think they are incapable of feeling empathy, which nearly all of us are. In the case involving Amanda Todd, Todd made a video before she committed suicide. In her video, it was inidicated that she had some issues with people from school. However, it is unclear exactly what those issues were. The Amanda Todd case was labeled as a bullying case based on the single fact Todd had conflicts with people from school. This doesn’t at all mean that the case involving Todd was from a direct result of bullying. There is not enough evidence to label her death as a result of being bullied. The overly broad defintion of bullying leads parents to cry bully whenever their child had a conflict with another child. This is also the case for children who tend to play victim.

Sorting through every single accusation is a serious burden especially when no one really knows what to consider bullying and what to not consider bullying.  Understanding what bullying is and when bullying is happening is an extremely vital and integreal to the success of keeping children happy and healthy. A very effective stragedty of doing so is surverying children and teens themselves. Surveying helps teachers and parents better understand what bullying exactly is and what their children consider bullying. By listening to stories about the interpersonal conflicts of actual children and teens, we can grasp a better understanding of bullying.

Bazelon is correct with what she has to say. If we keep labeling every single case of a conflict between two kids an act of bullying, we are really going to be getting no where with our anti-bullying efforts. Bullying is much more then a fight over the last swing on the playground. Bullying leaves extreme physcologial wounds on someone and when actually being done, is a very serious matter. Getting through life means getting through conflicts with other people. We must start to clearly grasp the concept of an actual bully and start to notice the signs of bullying. If we start to do so, we can ultimately start to put an end to it. 

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Quick Write: Fallacies

After reading the article "The Dangerous Myth of Grade Inflation" I have conclude that Kohn's argument makes sense and I agree with what he is saying. Kohn states facts that back up his argument that grades have been decreasing throughout the recent years. Having facts and sources to help back up your argument is a really positive tool to help back up your argument. If Kohn took the approach to just start talking about grade inflation blindly and without any facts or supporting evidence, it would be harder for someone like myself to reason with him and see where he is coming from. I would most likely think he was full of it. Kohn also does a great job at using other people's arguments that are against his own to prove that they don't really make much sense and that they don't have any supporting evidence to back up what they are claiming. The following quote "First, it is difficult to argue that a standardized test taken in high school and grades for college course work are measuring the same thing" This is very true. You can't really compare someone's standardized test scores to the grades they are receiving in college. There are so many different factors that affect how someone did on certain tests, such as the SATs. Just because someone may have scored highly on the SATs, doesn't mean that they're going to do well in college. Kohn touches on many of these arguments throughout his article and it becomes clear that he is not guilty of fallacies.